Two or Three Things I Know About Texas

This'll put color in your cheeks.

The subjects, four women aged between 21-35 and in possession of varying levels of English proficiency, were given the second-grade-level Sweet Valley Kids series (chosen for being "both interesting and comprehensible") and encouraged to underline unfamiliar words or ask questions as they moved through the text.

Two months—not even—of school left, and damn it if I wasn’t being observed tomorrow I would snap up all the Sweet Valley High books in the library and force everyone, even F, who recently made a joke—in English!—about not being able to read (more like he mangled the English phrase “I can’t read,” which fact I refuse to find more than half depressing since he can—kind of—and most of the mangling was, I believe, on purpose) to read them and “write book reports” (i.e. fill in graphic organizers and/or sentence starters) for the rest of the year. And, according to this article, it would totes work!

Clicked through to a post on Jezebel about Carla Bruni, saw the above picture, and was immediately overwhelmed by a single thought: I didn’t know the French first lady was a KIPP supporter! (KIPP is a network of public schools in several states found by two TFA alums; their motto is “Work hard. Be nice.”) File that next to “falling asleep at a bar in Austin because I was so tired from a week with The Children,” and close the drawer marked “Reasons for Changing the Title of this Tumblr to ‘Teaching is Eating My Life.’”

Clicked through to a post on Jezebel about Carla Bruni, saw the above picture, and was immediately overwhelmed by a single thought: I didn’t know the French first lady was a KIPP supporter! (KIPP is a network of public schools in several states found by two TFA alums; their motto is “Work hard. Be nice.”) File that next to “falling asleep at a bar in Austin because I was so tired from a week with The Children,” and close the drawer marked “Reasons for Changing the Title of this Tumblr to ‘Teaching is Eating My Life.’”

Teaching, apparently, is sometimes like this. (The closest I’ve gotten in my classroom is forcing English II to listen to songs I like—Nico’s “These Days,” The National’s “Start A War,” just for example—and analyze the tone. When I encouraged them to bring in their own songs, H asked, “Do they, um, have to be slow?” To which I replied: “No—just because I listen to sad girl music doesn’t mean you have to!”)

Things I Read That I Don’t Love

Either there have been a spate of articles about education recently, or I’m just more likely to notice them because I’m now a teacher. Either way, two—this piece from this week’s Times Magazine and this, slightly older, from Salon—stuck in my mind, not so much for what they did but for what they didn’t say. To be fair: I “read” through these so quickly that it might be more fairly characterized as skimming—being a teacher may have made me more aware of articles about education but it has also made me far more anxious about reading them; the fear is that I’ll discover some journalistic inquiry into the state of education that will scream “TEACHING: UR DOIN IT WRONG”—but neither managed to say anything I was particularly interested in reading.

The thesis of the Salon article was, as far as I could tell: “Maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to fire teachers without the input of students and parents. Maybe. But who knows? This issue is complicated!” The Times article, on the other hand, was more an examination of various teacher training techniques that might be implemented to improve the effectiveness of current staff. And while the Times article was well-reported and would have offered interesting insights to the non-teacher me of one year ago, it also, somehow, missed the point. Non of the classrooms discussed, for example, were (as far as I can remember) above the fifth grade level. And the miracle of “Positive Framing” and it’s subcategory “Narrate the Positive” in terms of classroom management is less impressive when you’ve been complimenting L on her ability to sit down and get to work immediately for six months now and the only thing that has any impact on student behavior is writing referrals, waiting calmly while a security guard comes to escort three screaming girls from your room, and repressing the urge to cry after when the rest of the class (now only four in number) says it’s your fault (that was my last block on Friday). I guess what I’m trying to say—and maybe this is a complaint that professionals of any field have when someone writes about their work—is that without having experienced both the peculiar torture/crushing sense of failure that is/accompanies a classroom in which chaos, rather than mastery, reigns, it’s difficult to write cogently about possible solutions.

That’s why I continue to rep this New Yorker article so hard—it acknowledges precisely the disconnect between the perspective of those who comment upon education and actual educators—which is a disconnect parallel to that between the performance of teachers in other endeavors (college, for example) outside the classroom and their ability to actually teach. What Gladwell ends up advocating for is modifying the hiring process for teachers so that it more closely resembles that of a top investment bank: lots of training, highly competitive. Teachers who failed during training/in the classroom—by failing to manage the students’ behavior, deliver content clearly, etc—wouldn’t be entrusted with the young minds of tomorrow, just as I-bankers who can’t do … whatever I-bankers do, don’t get to start at $80,000 at Goldman Sachs.

Of course, using this system, I’d surely have been shown the door by now. Which is, truly, as it should be.

Good/Bad/Ugly

I report, you decide:

  • A student tried to start a fight in my class, then maybe, jokingly, tried to punch me (ok, ok—he was only pounding a fist into his hand and saying, “Miss, I want to go back in and PUNCH HIM,” but still).
  • A student is reading Dante’s “Divine Comedy.” And stayed during lunch to chat with me about it.
  • An English II teacher who recently (as in, over Winter Break) gave birth, has not been hired back for next year. I, however, have.
In an attempt to introduce the children to inferences in a non-threatening way—and also to win them over by revealing tidbits of my Very Exciting Personal Life—I showed all my classes the above picture on Monday, and asked them to infer the relationship and mood of Z and J, as well as the setting of the picture, based on visual clues.
Naturally, instead of a quick (and fun!) lesson on the meaning and application of literary terms, the entire exercise quickly devolved into merry chaos. In my first English I block, G asked me (in Spanish, as I’ve given up on pretending I can’t figure out what they’re saying ) if I could set him up with either/both. Several students in the same class tried to convince me that I was J, and were positive I was lying when I said I wasn’t. At least one asserted that they were “twins” because they looked “exactly alike” (less shocking than when my roommate E, a brunette, brought a blonde friend—with whom she shares pale skin and exactly zero additional facial features—into her classroom and her students claimed the same, but STILL).
In English II they were more direct: my student J instantly proclaimed both “HOT” and the majority agreed that Z looked both young and tired (to the first I replied, “Yeah, she gets that a lot”; I let the second one slide because I wasn’t about to explain that we were, in fact, very tired because we had all been drunk for a week).
By my last block (English I again) things had gotten so confused that someone posited a mother/daughter relationship—not saying who was who (this actually happened again today when I brought in a picture of two friends from high school; I’m guessing the high incidence of teen pregnancy in the Valley has something to do with their tendency to jump to this conclusion). One student formed a very complicated theory in which Z was married to or dating J’s brother, who was positively identified as the gentleman in the background wearing sunglasses. I’m thinking of bringing in a picture of my mother on Friday; the way things are going, they’ll probably assume she is me, in the future, because yes it is totally reasonable to infer that I have a time machine.

In an attempt to introduce the children to inferences in a non-threatening way—and also to win them over by revealing tidbits of my Very Exciting Personal Life—I showed all my classes the above picture on Monday, and asked them to infer the relationship and mood of Z and J, as well as the setting of the picture, based on visual clues.

Naturally, instead of a quick (and fun!) lesson on the meaning and application of literary terms, the entire exercise quickly devolved into merry chaos. In my first English I block, G asked me (in Spanish, as I’ve given up on pretending I can’t figure out what they’re saying ) if I could set him up with either/both. Several students in the same class tried to convince me that I was J, and were positive I was lying when I said I wasn’t. At least one asserted that they were “twins” because they looked “exactly alike” (less shocking than when my roommate E, a brunette, brought a blonde friend—with whom she shares pale skin and exactly zero additional facial features—into her classroom and her students claimed the same, but STILL).

In English II they were more direct: my student J instantly proclaimed both “HOT” and the majority agreed that Z looked both young and tired (to the first I replied, “Yeah, she gets that a lot”; I let the second one slide because I wasn’t about to explain that we were, in fact, very tired because we had all been drunk for a week).

By my last block (English I again) things had gotten so confused that someone posited a mother/daughter relationship—not saying who was who (this actually happened again today when I brought in a picture of two friends from high school; I’m guessing the high incidence of teen pregnancy in the Valley has something to do with their tendency to jump to this conclusion). One student formed a very complicated theory in which Z was married to or dating J’s brother, who was positively identified as the gentleman in the background wearing sunglasses. I’m thinking of bringing in a picture of my mother on Friday; the way things are going, they’ll probably assume she is me, in the future, because yes it is totally reasonable to infer that I have a time machine.

How (not) To Read and Why

At some point during my junior year, we read Nabokov’s essay “Good Readers and Good Writers” in my English class. Not very far into the essay, Nabokov writes:

One evening at a remote provincial college through which I happened to be jogging on a protracted lecture tour, I suggested a little quiz—ten definitions of a reader, and from these ten, the students had to choose the four definitions that would combine to make a good reader. I have mislaid the list, but as far as I can remember the definitions went something like this. Select four answers to the question what should a reader be to be a good reader:

1. The reader should belong to a book club.

2. The reader should identify himself or herself with the hero or heroine.

3. The reader should concentrate on the socio-economic angle.

4. The reader should prefer a story with action and dialogue to a story with none.

5. The reader should have seen the book in a movie.

6. The reader should be a budding author.

7. The reader should have imagination.

8. The reader should have memory.

9. The reader should have a dictionary.

10. The reader should have some artistic sense.

The students leaned heavily on emotional identification, action, and the socio-economic or historical angle. Of course, as you have guessed, the good reader is one who has imagination, memory, a dictionary, and some artistic sense—which sense I propose to develop in myself and in others whenever I have the chance.

I read this passage with a heavy heart. Of course I had guessed that Nabokov thought a good reader should have the last four qualities, but I also knew that I was all but incapable of really loving a book if I could not find at least one character—it didn’t have to be the hero or heroine, a minor character would do just as well in many cases—to identify with, to have and to hold, to love and to cherish as my own better, fictionalized, self. It’s a fault I have not yet overcome, one of many which makes me a necessarily imperfect—perhaps even a necessarily “bad”—reader and moviegoer (in Walker Percy’s The Moviegoer, by the way, I most definitely identify with Kate, the main character’s unstable cousin).

This is all to say that I have wanted to write something about JD Salinger’s passing, but have felt unable to because his books are all but impossible for me to critique, so closely do I identify with his characters (yes, Holden too; feel free to mock me for it). Perhaps it is because I read Catcher in the Rye, for the first, second, and third times, that horrible, psuedo-transformative year I spent in Italy, alone, in my room, hating everything and everyone. Perhaps it is because I was once compared, jokingly to Joyce Maynard. But the fact remains that whenever I was having some sort of low-grade breakdown in college, I used to console myself with the fact that, though I was in a very bad way, I was not as bad as Franny, refusing to eat and collapsing in the bathroom and running home to have a full blown nervous attack in the same place where they kept my goddamn tap shoes in the closet.

Some have written (in the comments section of the Times, if memory serves) that they didn’t like Catcher in high school because it was forced down their throats. I had something of the opposite experience. When I came back to the States, the same English teacher who had us read “Good Readers and Good Writers” assigned Catcher—only he didn’t like it. I had already formed an emotional bond and so my teacher’s distate for what he interpreted as Salinger’s belief that corrupted men can be redeemed by pure young girls (cf. in Catcher, Phoebe and Jane, and in Salinger’s life, Maynard) struck me as tragic and sad and above all “touching,” rather than as an indictable offense.

Anyway. It turns out I don’t have much to say about Salinger’s death because the man himself, was always, for me, beside the point. I’m sad he stopped writing, but I’m glad that before he did he gave me characters I could compare myself to and find myself in, even if that makes me a bad reader and a non-critic of fiction and, above all, a big ol’ phony.

Brett Favre is the Saddest Man in Professional Football

Never more true than it is right now. The Vikings HAD THIS ONE IN THE BAG, and then Favre threw an interception with 19 seconds to go in the 4th quarter, within field goal range. If he doesn’t cry at his post-game press conference and vow—once more, this time with EVEN MORE feeling—that he will retire, I will eat my lesson plans. Felled by his own hubris. I love you Brett Favre, I really do, but that was BONEHEADED call. And you know it old man. This is why people—not me, even now—hate you.

[Edit: The Times analysis this morning claims that a penalty pushed them out of field goal range and forced Favre’s hand, which makes a lot more sense—still a bad call, but a least one can see the logic of it now. I guess this is one of the problems with “watching” a football game over the phone and on your computer. Still, when your kicker is Ryan Longwell, the definition of “field goal range” necessarily expands.]

Miranda’s Big Mistake

Because I am made extraordinarily anxious by change, the big decisions I make are rarely educated ones. That may not seem to follow, but in my—surely excitable, likely warped—mind, it does. I make decisions based on little information, “woman’s intuition,” and inexplicable sentiment. Instead of scrupulously investigating my options—which, contra logic, only serves to make me more aware of the many subsequent, smaller decisions I will be forced to make following the big decision, and therefore, more anxious—I leap, eyes mostly closed. I practice avoidance. I procrastinate and ignore.

Take the college application process. Throughout high school, my mind was fixed firmly—but abstractly—on college. I believed my self-worth would be largely determined by the caliber of school I chose to attend, that I would be a failure if I did not gain admission to a prestigious institution of higher learning—and this made me absolutely unable to properly research any of the colleges I planned on applying to. My Senior year of high school, I was all but unable to open those ubiquitous college planning guides; just being in the same room as one made me physically ill. So when it came time to fill out the Common Ap, I looked at the list of schools my then-boyfriend was considering, added a few Ivies, and blindly applied. (This had some hilarious side-effects, like my ignorance of the existence of the University of Chicago until about halfway through my Freshman year.) I chose Yale not because I thought it would be the best fit, but because one of my high school teachers recommended it—and when I say “one of my high school teachers,” I mean a recent Yale graduate who taught at my high school for about two years, with whom I never took a class, and upon whom I nursed the largest of adolescent crushes.

Z once told me an anecdote about a friend of hers from high school—who, incidentally, also went to Yale—who once, when confronted with a grungy taco stand menu, found herself absolutely overwhelmed by the four options before her, and burst into tears. My own decision-making abilities are not quite so cripplingly inadequate, but there’s a reason I remember and identify with that girl’s distress.

All of this is a sort of prelude to a prelude, that prelude being: I knew very little about teaching, TFA, or South Texas when I accepted my assignment here. I may have even thought that South Texas was equivalent to Austin (which would explain why it ranked anywhere near the top of my list of preferred regions). I certainly thought that it would be nothing but ranches and cows and open skies and that I would be living alone in a wood frame house, wearing a prairie dress and shielding my eyes from the sun as I hung my clothes out to line-dry. There would be wind and dry grass. It was all very melancholy, and very picturesque.

I wasn’t totally wrong. There are ranches, and cows—Z and I took pictures of both and put them on facebook—in South Texas; just not where I live. And the backyard of my wood frame house is in fact overrun with dead grass. But for the most part, McAllen is not at all like the Terrence Malick film I had been running in my head (“Days of Heaven,” not “Badlands,” in case you were wondering).

And in some cases, that’s a good thing. Way back in June, I told H my plan: to live alone, with a cat. The conversation took place over the phone, but his tone—and, I assume, his face—were appalled: “You’re going to be an English teacher. Who lives alone. With her cat.” He said it incredulously, as if he could not imagine anyone, even me, being so willfully self-destructive. “Yes,” I said calmly. “Yes.” Shortly thereafter we hung up, and a few minutes later I received a text message from him: a picture of a children’s book entitled “Miranda’s Big Mistake.”

Of course, I didn’t end up making what, I now see, would have been a very big mistake indeed. However I did—and here is the actual story I set out to tell, lo these many words ago—teach my ESL students the word “mistake” last week. (I also taught them the word “failure” and “misfortune”—you’d think I was trying to tell them something but no, all those word were grouped together by the authors of the sample ESL textbook I received late last semester and have only just gotten around to using.) My two favorite student example sentences were, hands down: “The chupa cabra is a good mistake,” and “I made a mistake when my girlfriend gets pregnated.” The latter got credit, as it does in fact contain an infinite number of mistakes.

Not a tautology

Failing the children feels a lot like failing the children.